| ||||
|
800 MEGAHERTZ TRAFFIC JAMS BLANK OUT EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS EMILY TSAO Summary: Interference near cell sites can leave firefighters and police unable to talk to dispatchers Public safety officials from Baton Rouge, La., to the island of Maui in Hawaii are starting to document an alarming trend -- dead zones created when police and fire radios are overwhelmed by signals from cell sites that serve wireless customers. Closer to home, a Tigard fire engine
was bombarded with interference as it left the station and was unable to
receive information. Twice, Tigard police have faced armed suspects and
were unable to radio for assistance.
"The potential for a really
catastrophic result exists," Tigard Police Captain Gary Schrader said. "If
an officer was shot, and he called for help and couldn't get medical
assistance, it could result in the death of an officer needlessly."
Many of the problems reported here
and nationwide can be traced to cell sites, which include cell phone
towers and antennas, owned by Nextel. Its Oregon manager, Chris Panel,
says, "In the long-term, this is going to be an issue that will get
worse."
Officials monitoring this problem on
a national level do not yet have a clear sense of the scope of the
interference.
"We know there is a problem," said
Rick Murphy of the Public Safety Wireless Network, a partnership of the
Department of Treasury and the Department of Justice. "But it is vague in
solution and how widespread."
Both wireless companies and public
safety agencies use frequencies in the 800 megahertz
bandwidth. As a police cruiser is rolling to a call, it can pass through
several wireless cell sites that use a variety of frequencies. Depending
on the frequencies, the wireless signal can drown out the police signal.
A good example is outlined in a
report for the Federal Communications Commission prepared by the
Washington County dispatch system. The county transmitting tower sits atop
Council Crest in Portland. Four miles away is a fire station that gets
garbled signals because of a Nextel site just down the street. Portable
radios inside the station actually work better when the station garage
door is closed because its helps to block the Nextel signals.
The report, prepared by Joe Kuran,
technical systems manager for the dispatch system, concludes that "as
Nextel adds sites to improve their coverage . . . public safety
deteriorates."
Sites increase tenfold The insatiable
consumer demand for wireless products has created the problem, unheard of
a decade ago. In 1996, Nextel operated just under 1,000 cell sites across
the nation. Today the company, based in Reston, Va., operates 12,500 sites
and has 6.2 million customers. Nextel, with annual revenues exceeding $3.3
billion, came to Oregon in March 1997 and has about 80 cell sites in the
Portland area.
Some agencies have been able to
pinpoint exact cell site locations as the culprit. In King County, Wash.,
authorities discovered that a cell site at a Seattle intersection was the
problem. Michigan State Police were able to ferret out one specific
frequency of a cellular company on the 800 bandwidth that was creating
their dead zones.
But of the roughly 30 responses to a
survey last fall by the Association of Public Safety Communications
Officials, most agencies simply listed "Nextel" or "cellular sites" as an
interference source. Most of the agencies also reported that their
problems remain unsolved.
Nextel's vice president of government
affairs, Lawrence Krevor, said of the interference that "I don't think
this is a massive problem, but when it happens, it is a very important
problem. We give it a high priority."
And as the Association of Public
Safety Communications Officials' survey showed, the interference can
theoretically come from different wireless providers.
Similar frequencies assigned The
Federal Communications Commission began allocating 800 megahertz frequencies in the 1970s. As demand increased over the
years, companies such as Nextel were able to buy frequencies near ones
reserved for public safety agencies.
"The real culprit isn't Nextel," said
Nancy Jesuale, the city of Portland's director of communications and
networking. "The FCC is the culprit."
Kathleen Ham, deputy chief of the
FCC's wireless communications bureau, said that the agency is all too
often the scapegoat.
"Back in the '70s, the
then-commission thought it was allocating in the best way for the uses of
that day," she said. "We learned something from this, and we are trying to
ensure that it does not happen in other instances."
Last year, the FCC brought together
commercial providers and public safety officials to discuss the problem.
The group included representatives of Nextel and the Association of Public
Safety Communications Officials and printed a report in December that
suggests how both sides can work together to minimize interference.
Some of the suggestions for private
providers include raising the height of the cell tower antenna or
reprogramming the frequency so it does not clash with police or fire,
Nextel's Krevor said. Remedies for public agencies include buying
filtering devices or locating a public transmitter adjacent to a Nextel or
other commercial cell site. Dual sites side-by-side prevent one signal
from overriding another, Krevor said.
RoxAnn Brown, director of the
Washington County Consolidated Communications Agency, said that upgrades
and equipment can cost millions of dollars and that most public agencies
do not have those financial resources.
Nextel officials say they will
continue to try to resolve interference problems. However, the company has
purchased the access rights to its 800 megahertz frequencies
and fully intends to use them.
"As the public requires more and more
wireless, it will require us to utilize all the frequencies we have paid
for," Panel said.
You can reach Emily Tsao at
503-294-5968 or by e-mail at emilytsao@news.oregonian.com. |